<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some insight on compulsory internet filtering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrisduran.eu/opinion/some-insight-on-compulsory-internet-filtering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrisduran.eu/opinion/some-insight-on-compulsory-internet-filtering/</link>
	<description>on surfing, positive cognition, IT and life...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 19:02:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://chrisduran.eu/opinion/some-insight-on-compulsory-internet-filtering/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 05:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisduran.eu/?p=135#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Yup, the word on the street seems to be that it should be a pretty trivial matter to get through the filter. There is an interesting article on Conroy&#039;s wavering levels of ownership for the policy I found too:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/conroy-backtracks-on-internet-censorship-policy/2009/04/01/1238261622790.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, the word on the street seems to be that it should be a pretty trivial matter to get through the filter. There is an interesting article on Conroy&#8217;s wavering levels of ownership for the policy I found too:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/conroy-backtracks-on-internet-censorship-policy/2009/04/01/1238261622790.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/conroy-backtracks-on-internet-censorship-policy/2009/04/01/1238261622790.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schoonzie</title>
		<link>http://chrisduran.eu/opinion/some-insight-on-compulsory-internet-filtering/comment-page-1/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Schoonzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 21:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrisduran.eu/?p=135#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Great post Chris - I totally agree. If people want to access that crap, it won&#039;t be hard to find a way around the filter anyway and it will just be the rest of us that suffer. Hopefully the trials are a failure and prove that this isn&#039;t the way to go about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Chris &#8211; I totally agree. If people want to access that crap, it won&#8217;t be hard to find a way around the filter anyway and it will just be the rest of us that suffer. Hopefully the trials are a failure and prove that this isn&#8217;t the way to go about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
